Fetish porn producers in Britain are yelling “bloody hell!” this week after a new set of censorship laws aimed at BDSM internet porn. And the Brits who want to get their rocks off to some good old fashioned kinky BDSM aren’t happy about it either. That’s right, the UK prudes have just banned a variety of sex acts from porn videos made in the UK, most of which are BDSM related. As Frankie Mullin at Vice explains, “That means that British pornography producers will no longer be able to offer content online that couldn’t be bought in a sex shop.”
Basically, the censorship laws say that all streaming content must not contain anything that might corrupt the morals of impressionable, under 18 people—and to the people who passed these laws, that mostly means fetish, BDSM porn. Some of the specially restricted BDSM porn includes: caning, spanking, aggressive whipping, penetration by any object “associated with violence,” physical or verbal abuse, urolangia (i.e., “water sports”), strangulation, and, bizarrely, facesitting. The last one just seems excessively prudish, and sexist—they also banned female ejaculation and fisting. These new rules just seem like another way to censor perfectly consensual BDSM acts and further stigmatize a kinky niche sex market.
We say to British BDSM censorship: Bollocks to that! Want to exercise your freedom to be kinky with us? We love all things BDSM!
@NiteFlirt
This Censorship IS KNEEJERK – and The Prudes are feeling ignored and abandoned – I dont need to say why ! Anyone can tell this …. well that is .. maybe not the “Prudes” they will live in the Vanilla Closet and perhaps die there slowly masterbating themselves untill they expire in secret. BDSM “Kink” is called that for a very good reason – it is NOT ment for total absolute exposure accros the boards, “Kink” addresses certain collections and grouping of people that KNOW their own boundries – and are VERY respectful of the boundries of others – I seem to reflect a Biblical quote – If thy right eye offends thee pluck it out ! – The Prudes are externalizing that without concern or consideration for ANY others – as a blanket “Action” that according to “”Their” perception – is for the “presumed” benifit of all – … Well honestly … How “Arrogant” is That ??? … How very nearsighted and pompous of them – So Yes … Bollocks to the Censorship of “The Prudes” – Let them masterbate by themselves, alone and ignored.